Aerospace and Defense (A&D) technology developers face increasing risks if they donot appropriately adopt Additive Manufacturing (AM). While much-publicized AM advantages for piece-part designs are already accepted as advantageous as part of big picture production plans, most stakeholders are failing to reap further strategic, operational benefits.These build local competitive advantage as well as improve the industry, paying it forward for critical national security missions.
The Problem
The return on investment analysis for AM adoption is complicated and usually only looks at advantages such as faster prototyping, cost savings and reduced environmental impact. After all, who wouldn’t want to gain these improvements?
While dabbling in AM is common among the A&D sector, true implementation at scale is very scarce. Over-hype since AM emerged as a standalone technology has, additionally, led to skepticism and trepidation that hinders its adoption across this industry, from which missions could greatly benefit. Critics claim that AM is insufficiently mature, is difficult to inspect, reduces strength/weight ratio for parts and hardware,uses more expensiveraw materials, and doesn’t adapt to high volume production.Advocates claim that these issues are being mitigated.
Adoption Advantages Which Must Be Considered
If appropriately qualified and applied, AM can help teams solve a number of their most pressing engineering challenges in unique and exciting ways. Transitioning to AM is challenging, but worth the up-front effort.
Although one shouldn’t try to use AM for everything, itmakes a big difference when utilized effectively for top-priority missions. One way isbyshortening prototype lead timeas well as reducing part count, material cost, and environmental impact. AM capability can enable teams to build complex parts with internal features likecooling tubes, structural reinforcements and reduce part count – sometimes called “free design complexity”.Production speeds have also improved, mitigated by shorter lead-times.Cost, strength,and weight can also be improved when AM is utilized for the right parts and when compared to traditional manufacturing methods. And overall,the use of AM quality control can be greatly simplified with new techniques such as digital radiography andProcess Compensated Resonance Testing (PCRT) which can eliminate the need for costly computed tomography (CT) scanning.
But additional strategic factors must not be overlooked as AM is adopted across the industry: