Air defence has evolved due to the rise of air power which initially started with fighter/bomber aircraft. Over a while attack helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, and cruise and ballistic missiles became part of the air threat.
FREMONT, CA: A battle management system that integrates all of these subsystems is part of the Army Air Defence (AAD) system, which also comprises surveillance sensors, fire control devices, and kill weapons such as guns, missiles, and directed energy weapons. Because of the expansion of air power, which began with fighter/bomber aircraft, air defence has changed. Over time, the air threat expanded to include attack helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), cruise, and ballistic missiles. Thus, the competition between air threats and the counter-to-air threat is still going strong as both dimensions strive to advance their technologies. The addition of unconventional warfare has made finding solutions more difficult.
Conventional Guns: The initial line of defence against aviation threats was firearms, notably machine guns. These weapons weren't intended for use in air defence. The development of air defence weapons began in World War II. The 40mmL/60 cannon, which was originally from Sweden and had a rapid rate of fire, was the most widely utilised weapon by the Allies. This weapon was replaced by the radar-controlled 40mmL/70. Several nations have created a wide variety of air defence weapons with different ranges, calibres, and fire control systems. By offering superior fire control systems and a rapid rate of fire, inefficiencies in firing caused by a moving target in all three dimensions simultaneously, such as a fighter aircraft, gravity, and the impact of atmospheric conditions, were compensated for. The calibre of the cannon had to be regulated due to the high rate of fire since otherwise, it would become exceedingly heavy, limiting mobility. The focus of development is now on fire control systems and ammunition because the development of conventional weapons has reached a plateau.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Surface to air missile systems: The Army requires highly transportable systems with extremely quick deployment and redeployment times. It should also deal with attack helicopters, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs). The most recent version of Barak 8 and Patriot Advanced Capability 3 (PAC 3) both make these claims. A proximity-fused warhead is entirely unnecessary thanks to the PAC 3 warhead's unique hit-to-kill (kinetic kill vehicle) feature. The missile does, however, have a lethality enhancer (a small explosive-directed warhead) that fires a stream of low-speed steel shards in the direction of the target to increase the crosssection of the missile and the likelihood of a kill. Short- to a long-range point and area defence on land and at the water is provided by Barak 8. The missile's core components include a multimission radar, a state-of-the-art phased array, modern missile technology, and a flexible command and control system. Many more sophisticated systems, including those for Manpads, are now being developed. With a single missile system, various air threats are intended to be neutralised quickly and accurately in any weather.
Fire control systems: An essential component of a SAM system is a monitoring and fire control system. There used to be distinct radars for fire control and surveillance. Even though UAVs and satellites can also supply this information, long-range missiles still need this setup. Radar's antenna height determines its effective range, which makes it ineffective against low-flying targets. The observation and fire control functions are merged into one radar for short-range quick reaction missiles. The detection of stealth items presents another difficulty.
