While on an Alitalia flight from NY to Rome last month, I made a decision to require an opportunity from my grinding, persistent insomnia (I cannot sleep on planes for whatever reason) to see out the in-flight connectivity offerings. At that time, within the flight, we were about one thousand miles southwest of Iceland and well into the zone that was referred to as the “Mid-Atlantic Gap” during war II. During the war, that term described a neighborhood within the North Atlantic that was beyond the range of land-based aircraft wont to protect Allied shipping lanes. More recently, beginning in 2005 approximately, this term was employed by seasoned international travelers to explain the whole four or five-hour journey over the Atlantic where there was no ground-to-air connectivity for the airline passenger. Now, just a couple of short years later, as I connected my devices to Alitalia’s WiFi (for a price of 40 Euros), I marveled over the dramatic improvements in air-to-satellite coverage, speeds, and accuracy offered by the airlines and their satellite partners.
The fact is that each one consumer expects – and regularly demands – some kind of WiFi connectivity option nowadays, no matter where they'll be: during a cafe, at a park, or on an airplane that's 35,000 feet within the air. Further, these customers own multiple PEDs (Portable Electronic Devices) with apps that have progressively insatiable data appetites. And here is another emerging trend: American consumers expect that WiFi connectivity choice to be free or very nearly free. Interestingly, European consumers still expect to pay a premium for WiFi connectivity, but even that's slowly changing although Europeans still gleefully expect to buy using public restrooms, which is unprecedented in America lately.
For most businesses, this consumer expectation can usually be met with a really modest investment. For an airline, however, the investment required is often within the millions – or many millions, depending upon the dimensions and complexity of the aircraft fleet – and therefore the risk suddenly rockets into the stratosphere seeing that the typical “take rate” for consumer-paid in-flight WiFi approach is about six percent, meaning that on an aircraft with 175 passengers only 10.5 of them can pay for the service.


